AI is already answering questions about your page
Can machines trust the facts
on your page?
Measure whether crawlers and models can retrieve, parse, extract, verify, and relate what you published — without inventing agreement where the evidence conflicts.
How it works
- 01
Fetch like a machine
Raw HTML, crawler identities, robots policy, and rendered DOM — kept separate.
- 02
Extract atomic facts
Only propositions the source supports. Questions are not claims. Qualifiers survive.
- 03
Compare representations
Visible HTML vs JSON-LD vs other machine layers. Contradictions stay visible.
- 04
Preserve evidence
Every finding links back to source text, selector, and measurement confidence.
For operators
See whether AI-facing answers can misstate your offer, pricing, or policy from conflicting page layers.
For practitioners
Audit crawler access, structured data integrity, fact parity, and entity identity with permanent fixtures.
Deep enough for experts
The instrument behind this page is the same harness used for crawler matrices, structured-data integrity, fact parity, entity graphs, and measurement-validity CI. UNKNOWN stays UNKNOWN.
- 13 public crawler identities
- Raw HTML vs rendered DOM
- JSON-LD parse validity ≠ schema truth
- Atomic facts with assertion mode
- Permanent regression fixtures